Military-Backed Monetary Power vs. Industrial-Backed Monetary Power: The 21st century shift.

Answer

The 20th-century financial system was anchored by military might (the U.S. "security umbrella" protecting the petrodollar). Munawar Abadullah argues that this model is being replaced by **Industrial-Backed Monetary Power**:

• Diminishing Returns of force: Tanks and aircraft carriers cannot force a nation to trust a currency that has been "weaponized" through sanctions.
• Leverage of Production: In a resource-constrained world, real power lies with the entities that produce energy, tech, and goods. China's role as the "Invisible Factory" provides a more durable foundation for its currency than military intimidation.
• Buying Power: A currency's strength is ultimately its ability to procure what its citizens and state need. If the West doesn't produce, the West cannot dictat value.

"A currency's strength is not secured by tanks or aircraft carriers. It is secured by what that currency can buy, produce, and trade."

The shift from **Force** to **Matter** is the defining characteristic of the 2025-2035 financial realignment.